>
ABOUT THIS SITE
Download the full report
How does the chicken you eat get to you? There is growing public awareness of the treatment of animals in our food chain, but sometimes the treatment of workers attracts less public attention. This site is the result of research conducted by Oxfam on poultry workers in the US. We collected stories, photos, and video from these workers—women and men who want you to understand what’s wrong with the industry and how you can help them.
Contents
- A note about privacy
- Methodology
- Poultry companies’ policies on workers
- Coalition
- Acknowledgments
- What people are saying
- Learn more
- FAQs
A note about privacy
Most of the workers interviewed by Oxfam requested the use of pseudonyms out of fear of retribution. We have included related details about their jobs and plants where they worked, but have omitted locations in most cases to offer some privacy.
Many workers generously agreed to be interviewed, and/or photographed and filmed with the explicit goal of sharing their stories and experiences with the public. If workers were concerned about the consequences to themselves and their families if they spoke publicly, we offered to conceal their identities further by filming them back-lit or showing only their hands.
Methodology
Oxfam America conducted research on the poultry industry from 2013 to 2015. The research entailed literature and primary document review and interviews to provide an empirical description of the status of poultry processing workers in the current context of the US poultry sector.
Oxfam staff traveled to Arkansas, North Carolina, and Mississippi to conduct dozens of semi-structured interviews with current and former workers, worker advocates, attorneys, medical experts, analysts, and others in the communities.
The research also benefits from work conducted by government agencies and non-profits over many years; in all, they surveyed over a thousand current and former poultry workers. In addition, our research team reviewed more than 200 works about the industry, from books to medical research. Still, a great deal of information about the industry remains unavailable (e.g., compensation and demographics).
Oxfam America reached out to all companies named in this report to share the findings of our research and engage them in dialogue about solutions. Tyson Foods and Perdue are the only companies that responded. They cited a number of policies (some public and some not) that address issues raised in Oxfam's report. The full report incorporates that feedback.
Poultry companies’ policies on workers
TYSON FOODS is the only top poultry company to have a Team Members’ Bill of Rights. In this document, the company commits to a safe workplace and to maintaining safety committees that include hourly employees. Tyson also commits to upholding several rights for workers: to file complaints with the plant safety committee without fear of reprisal; to claim existing state and federal benefits; to be free from discrimination and retaliation; to compensation for work performed; to information (including the Bill of Rights and Code of Conduct), and to understand the information being provided; to choose to join together for collective bargaining; to continuing training; and to adequate equipment at no cost. Tyson’s Code of Conduct elaborates further, including a pledge to provide “reasonable time for necessary restroom breaks” during production shifts and to uphold the principles of human rights.
According to Tyson’s workplace safety policy on its website, all employees are to receive detailed safety training during orientation, as well as continued training, in multiple languages. Tyson maintains that many of their facilities have safety and ergonomic committees and include full-time safety managers and occupational health nurses. All Tyson employees receive health insurance, but hourly workers do not receive paid sick leave.
Tyson has established a 24-hour confidential and anonymous hotline for complaints, and has a policy to discipline anyone who retaliates against an employee. Tyson requires any worker who is injured to report it and their policy states that “corporate health and safety professionals visit each facility at least once a year and conduct a compliance audit every two years.”
Tyson Foods informed Oxfam they had commissioned a wage survey that found they pay wages which exceed those of their competitors in the poultry industry. However, Oxfam could not verify the results of the survey. Tyson also stated that they employ industrial engineers to determine appropriate speed and staffing of production lines, with safety as a key factor. This practice is not public, nor are the standards used to set staffing and line speed. Finally, Tyson stated that facility management teams conduct annual reviews to measure injury and illness rates, average lost and restricted days per case, workers’ compensation costs, absenteeism rate, and turnover, among other factors. This information is not made publicly available, so Oxfam was unable to examine the methods employed, the standards used, or the data collected. Oxfam’s research revealed conditions that do not meet Tyson’s publicly stated standards and policies. We conducted interviews with Tyson workers in multiple states, and reviewed records of documented labor violations in Tyson plants. Tyson workers consistently reported conditions that contradict Tyson policy, including, but not limited to, supervisors refusing to grant restroom breaks, workers enduring hazardous and unsafe work conditions, and workers afraid to speak out or use the hotline due to fear of reprisal. Even at Tyson’s reported wage levels, many of their workers earn wages that leave them near the poverty line. Tyson has also been officially sanctioned by governmental agencies on multiple occasions for failing to pay workers appropriately and for safety violations.
While some of Tyson’s policies on workers’ rights are ahead of industry counterparts, they still fall short in key areas, such as paid sick leave and fair compensation. But, more crucially, it is impossible to verify their policies in practice using publicly available data. For example, in Tyson Foods Sustainability Highlights for FY 2014, they cite a “10% reduction in the Total OSHA Recordable Incident Rate” since FY13; but there is no supporting information. Tyson’s internal audits are not sufficient to judge whether their publicly stated policies are being followed. The audits are limited to health and safety, rather than the full set of rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The audits are conducted by Tyson corporate employees, rather than independent third parties. Since the results of these audits are not made public, it is not possible to judge their efficacy. Tyson’s policies on workers’ rights lack effective measurement and transparency reporting, making meaningful accountability at the individual plant and worker level difficult to achieve and impossible to assess.
Tyson issued a formal response to Oxfam’s report, which can be found on Oxfam America's website.
PILGRIM’S claims to have released its first Corporate Responsibility report in an Investor Relations press release from 2012. However, the report has since become unavailable, and its new Corporate Responsibility page does not mention any commitments to their workers on any issues regarding compensation, health and safety, or workers’ rights.
PERDUE has a Corporate Responsibility Platform that details its commitment to its employees, food quality, the environment, and the community. The company commits to creating a “culture of safety” in its plants by setting annual Safety Score goals, allowing workers to halt production to prevent impending accidents, and offering employees the opportunity to visit Wellness Centers during work hours. Perdue has a policy on employee rights, where it pledges to incorporate associates’ voices into decision-making by encouraging employees to raise concerns with management, and “empower[ing] them to contribute ideas and identify opportunities for improvement.”
Worker testimony reveals that these policies do not always translate into practice. Perdue claims to have achieved progress on worker safety and health, but does not publicly release statistics beyond unverified claims such as “we exceeded our safety goals…by more than 18%.” Perdue’s lack of transparent reporting and public accountability mechanisms prevents a fair assessment of whether these policies are being effectively implemented in practice. Still other policies are not in sync with the company’s stated goals of empowering workers: Perdue’s aforementioned employee rights commitment maintains that a non-unionized workforce presents the “best opportunity” for them to foster a “trust based environment.”
Perdue issued a formal response to Oxfam’s report, which can be found on Oxfam America's website.
SANDERSON FARMS publishes a corporate responsibility report every year. The focus is almost entirely on environmental responsibility and improving energy, packaging, and water use. There is no mention of workers or health and safety.
Sanderson Farms sent a statement in opposition to Oxfam’s shareholder resolution concerning transparency in occupational health and safety. The statement includes information about worker health and safety in their operations. You can find the statement here.
Coalition
Oxfam has been working with a number of organizations devoted to improving conditions for poultry workers across the US. In addition to Oxfam, the members of this coalition are:
- Center for Progressive Reform
- Coalition of Black Trade Unionists
- Greater Minnesota Worker Center
- Interfaith Worker Justice
- National Council of La Raza
- Nebraska Appleseed
- Northwest Arkansas Workers’ Justice Center
- Southern Poverty Law Center
- United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
- Western North Carolina Workers’ Center
Acknowledgments
We are profoundly grateful to the workers who were willing to talk honestly and openly about their experiences in the poultry industry with us. They showed great courage and grace under pressure.
In addition, we consulted numerous experts and advocates about the realities of life for poultry processing workers in the US today. We are grateful for their knowledge, commitment, and willingness to share their expertise. The following people were particularly generous with their time:
- Christopher Cook
- Tom Fritzsche
- Christopher Leonard
- Celeste Monforton
- Angela Stuesse
- Darcy Tromanhauser and Omaid Zabih of Nebraska Appleseed
- Staff at the Northwest Arkansas Workers’ Justice Center
- Staff at the Southern Poverty Law Center
- Staff at the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union
- Staff at the Western North Carolina Workers’ Center
In addition to the efforts of Oxfam’s own staff, we are indebted to those whose talents have helped us to bring this story alive:
Our thanks to Earl Dotter for photography where noted.
Our thanks to John D. Simmons/The Charlotte Observer for photography where noted.
Oxfam gratefully acknowledges the work that Brother David Henley, a member of Glenmary Home Missioners, has done to publicize the issue of conditions within poultry plants. Because very little footage exists publicly of what it looks like inside the plants, and Oxfam did not have access, we are deeply grateful to Gabriela Solis and Karina Oliva who agreed to let us use the footage from within the plants that they shot when they were journalism students. Although they shot this footage in December 2008, current and former workers agree that this is an accurate representation of current work conditions on the line.
Our thanks to Jimena Vallejo for some last minute translations.
For their deep commitment to this issue, collaboration on the site, and patience during the extensive editing process, our heartfelt thanks to the extended team at Grazioso Pictures, Inc.:
- Alan Catello Grazioso - Producer, Director, and Editor
- Patricia Alvarado Núñez - Consulting Producer
- Milton Kam - Director of Photography
- Julio Tordoya and Bacilio Castro - Field Producers (North Carolina)
- Jose Luis Aguayo and Albious Latior - Field Producers (Arkansas)
- Lynn Congo, Annette Alvarado-Cuellar, Alejandro Cuellar, Monica Núñez, and Carla Pataky - Transcriptions and translations
What people are saying
“In this groundbreaking report, Oxfam exposes an under-appreciated cost of chicken production in this country: the hazards poultry workers face. After decades of industry cost cutting and undermining worker protections, poultry workers today are among the most exploited and vulnerable. We hope this report will motivate people across the country to call on Tyson, Pilgrim’s, Perdue, and Sanderson Farms to improve working conditions and make their sector more transparent and accountable. Putting food on the table today shouldn’t cost lives.”
— Frances Moore Lappé and Anna Lappé, Founding principals, Small Planet Institute
“For over 50 years, I’ve worked with my brothers and sisters in the effort to improve conditions and wages for farm workers in the US. Just as the people who harvest our fruits and vegetables deserve justice, dignity, and fair compensation, so do other workers in the food system, including those who process the chickens that feed our families. I welcome this new effort to expose the conditions inside poultry plants, and to raise the voices and concerns of poultry workers.”
— Dolores Huerta, pioneering labor leader and co-founder of United Farm Workers
“The integrity of America’s food supply is only as strong as each of the links in the food supply chain. Alongside our abundant, safe and reasonably priced food, we need to ensure our food is produced under fair and safe working conditions. This report makes practical recommendations for improving the conditions for thousands of workers in America’s poultry industry. I welcome Oxfam’s creative thinking, and their strong commitment to innovation via public-private partnership to address the critical issues.”
— Dan Glickman, Former Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture
“Oxfam should be commended for exposing the true cost of poultry processing on worker health and safety. These workers are providing food to millions of Americans, yet don’t receive a living wage, paid time off, retirement security, or strong worker safety protections. By highlighting these conditions—and naming the companies responsible for them—Oxfam continues its long tradition of exposing problems in our global food system and supporting America’s food workers.”
— Danielle Nierenberg, President of Food Tank
Learn more
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Poultry Industry Workers.” www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/poultry/process.html
Fritzsche, Tom and Southern Poverty Law Center. Unsafe at These Speeds: Alabama’s Poultry Industry and Its Disposable Workers. Montgomery, AL: SPLC and Alabama Appleseed, 2013. www.splcenter.org/20130301/unsafe-these-speeds
Hall, Kerry, and Ames Alexander and Franco Ordonez. “The Cruelest Cuts: The Human Cost of Bringing Poultry to Your Table.” The Charlotte Observer. February 2008. www.charlotteobserver.com/news/special-reports/cruelest-cuts/article9012839.html
Human Rights Watch. Blood, Sweat, and Fear: Workers’ Rights in US Meat and Poultry Plants. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2004. www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/usa0105.pdf
Leonard, Christopher. The Meat Racket: The Secret Takeover of America’s Food Business. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 2014. www.christopherleonard.biz/the-book.html
Striffler, Steve. Chicken: The Dangerous Transformation of America’s Favorite Food. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007.
FAQs
Why is Oxfam—an international humanitarian and development organization—talking about poultry workers in the US?
Oxfam’s mission is to support the efforts of people around the world who are working to lift themselves out of poverty. For some years, Oxfam has had a US program that addresses the challenges that food workers—primarily farm workers—face. It’s important to examine the supply chain in our food system, and to consider the men and women who grow, harvest, and process America’s food. Poultry workers play a central role in producing the US’s most popular meat.
Oxfam’s involvement, however, is not just about identifying a need. We focus our efforts where we feel there is both a need and where our particular skills present an opportunity to make a difference. In recent years—engaging companies from Starbucks to Coca-Cola—Oxfam has gained credibility in our work assessing corporate impact on vulnerable communities and then mobilizing the public to encourage companies to have a positive social impact. We believe that if the US public understood what poultry industry watchdogs have known for years that this issue would finally attract the broad attention it deserves, and the public would hold companies accountable.
Do these issues affect organic, free range chickens?
Many consumers make the choice to purchase organic or free-range chicken. These choices offer potential benefits to the health and well-being of both chickens and consumers (fewer chemicals for both, more humane treatment for pasture-based or free range birds).
These choices, however, have little to do with what happens next: how chickens are processed. Once chickens reach a poultry processing plant, most still go through the stages outlined on this site; most workers still perform their tasks by hand in the same conditions described.
Some of the small businesses and companies that specialize in organic or free-range chickens do process their birds under different conditions. That said, some of the most popular organic and natural brands—such as Coleman Organic—are owned by the four top companies. And their chickens are processed just the way we’ve described here.
So should I stop eating chicken?
That is not what Oxfam is calling for. Our hope is that all of us who eat chicken will recognize our power as consumers to influence the industry—and to use our influence. These companies survive because of our choices. They care very much what we think.
As for eating chicken or not, that is a personal choice. We each decide what matters to us when we choose our food. We may exclude meat or eat only organic, or vegan, or fair trade. The choice is yours, but Oxfam firmly believes that you deserve to know enough to make informed choices. If you’re going to eat meat, you need to know what goes on behind the scenes—not only how the animals are treated, but how workers are treated in raising and processing our food.
We believe the industry exploits workers by treating them as disposable parts of the production process, but Big Poultry can produce healthy food ethically and profitably. We know that the industry can implement changes that will make it possible to work on the processing line without suffering. Poultry processing is difficult work, but it doesn’t need to be dangerous or undignified. Oxfam is asking that Big Poultry enable hard-working people to live well, support their families, and enjoy the bounty of the industry.
Then, what can consumers do?
Consumers have become increasingly aware of where their food comes from and how it gets to their table. This has happened more recently in the poultry industry, where consumers have begun to speak out about the safety of their food and the treatment of chickens. Oxfam is urging consumers to let poultry companies know that consumers care about how workers are treated.
- Consumers can sign the petition, available at oxfamamerica.org/livesontheline.
- Then they can share Oxfam’s story with their family, friends, and colleagues and urge them to learn more and sign the petition too.